Above are three different views on what kind of culture exists in America, and except perhaps for the first one there's more than a kernal of truth in each. However, I'm going to give you another view of America that can't be labeled too well beyond calling it a "culture of one." There is no dichotomy in which a person is easily assigned to one end of the spectrum or the other as conservative or liberal, or even placed in the center and considered moderate for that matter. It's a continuum that doesn't contain labels; it contains actual people who are individuals (whether they each act as an individual or as the conformist) no matter what cultural heritage they can claim. Each person is capable of thinking for him or herself, and even though there might be many similarities in the human experience each of us have, it's time to stop downplaying the existential fact that there are no two people exactly alike--not even identical twins.
(addendum) More notes on Himmelfarb's book: One Nation, Two Cultures:
According to Himmelfarb, bomemian or "alternative" lifestyles in contrast to a more traditional American way of life are now "tolerated" and accepted in the U.S. --My question is BY WHOM? It's like she wrote the book as a conservative in 1999 because she wanted to present an image of a division between two cultures in America for the sake of getting conservatives worried about the state of the union and vote for Bush in the 2000 election! She included all these statistics but her final evaluation is that the "liberal" way of life has become more "tolerated?" That's only the case if you're a conservative. This book has so much political bias disguised as social history it's not tolerable by any but the most conservative reader.
Why do these people keep asking Americans: Do you want THIS kind of America or do you want THAT kind? The dichotomous evaluation is so misleading!--as if even the fabricated dichotomy these people create is being enforced by them so they can make sure they stay in control.
